November 2, 2010

Double Tap Danger

Tokens continued to pepper the construct as the triple team kept the pace, pausing to check the responses as necessary. Having adjusted my scanning of the construct to encompass the entire scope that was illuminated by the "any" token, I prepared for whatever response might come my way. I watched in earnest as the team threw "Bob" at the construct and was not surprised that there was a null response like most of the other triple tokens.

As the connector word "but" flew toward the construct, I waited in anticipation, only do discover a response that was less than expected. There was little use for the word that identified exceptions and omissions as far as the construct was concerned, so only the most basic of connections were illuminated by it's presence. Things clicked over to the next leading token as the last 26 triples had zero effect.

Aside from the minimal response from the token "can" there were few responses in the third cycling of the last two places in the generated token, and certainly none worth mentioning. The response level did not break the threshold of the team, and the sequence completed and rolled over. Expecting few responses, the second position was already flipped over again as a reply broke the threshold and caused the sequence to backtrack and unflip the second position. On the second item after the click back, the repeated token washed over and out of the construct, spreading into the nearby nodes of the central network, resulting in a cascade that spun me into a frenzy.

No comments: